Time to think ahead

With gas prices fluctuating so much over the last year and expected to only increase, it is no wonder that the auto industry has suffered. Add to that, the current recession, an increased focus on the environment and a newfound love for public transit, and you begin to wonder whether the auto industry will ever recover.

It’s odd to imagine the auto industry being in such a predicament, since it has been an important part of this country’s ability to thrive economically and, a huge part of its identity. Despite this country’s love affair with the automobile, though, it is becoming increasingly obvious that the industry’s slump will not simply pickup once the economy rights itself. For example, even after the aforementioned volatile gas prices plunged significantly, public transit ridership numbers across the country remained high. This is proof that people are becoming more aware of the various benefits associated with not driving, such as alleviating stress, increasing exercise by walking more often and limiting their carbon footprint.

Although a long-time foe of General Motors (GM), documentary filmmaker Michael Moore, who gained notoriety for his movie Roger and Me, which examined the impact GM’s downsizing of its plant had in his hometown of Flint, Mich., recently proposed an idea that now may be the time for the automaker to cease making cars and instead use its facilities to make energy efficient clean buses and railcars. The move would have plenty of benefits, including keeping thousands of GM autoworkers employed and helping provide this country with a flourishing industry that promotes both economic growth and environmental consciousness. With the landscape of this country increasingly changing and forecasted to change even more in the next 25 years with population growth and the like, isn’t it time to start thinking ahead and promoting the sort of ideas that put us in position to be well prepared for the future? 

Alex Roman
Managing Editor

posted @ Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:34 PM

Print

Comments on this entry:

# re: Time to think ahead

Left by Ben at 6/11/2009 2:52 PM
Stop making cars so we can make more buses and trains? Oh please, let's be realistic. We need more transportation options, like transit, but not at the expense of another mode of transportation. Encourage Americans to lighten up on the use of the automobile and use transit, but don't force them to make a hard choice of one or the other. You might not like which one they choose. Transit needs a more qualified soothsayer than Michael Moore. We should throw him under the bus.

# re: Time to think ahead

Left by Gary Duerst at 6/11/2009 6:35 PM
"Public transit ridership numbers across the country remained high." Really? Anywhere near 10% of total trips? For those of us not in high density areas, the first mile, last mile issue means transit will never be more than a minor player in transporting working Americans.

# re: Time to think ahead

Left by Jan van Eck at 6/11/2009 7:02 PM
The point Mr. Moore was making (accurately) is that we have these highly developed manufacturing plants and skilled assembly workers, and this collective asset is being tossed aside in the shrinking of the auto market - so why not just use those assets to build items that can effectively use those developed manufacturing capabilities? A "railcar" can be considered as a big SUV on steroids; if there is a market, or one can be developed, then it certainly makes more sense to retool those plants to build railcars (or buses, or streetcars) than it does to scrap the plants and put the workers on the dole. I think Mr. Moore is onto something.
For those who think rail is only equal to "transit," I would say that I suspect that the use of rail will now undergo vast changes. Conventional "transit" is and will be with us, but that does not imply that private railcars simply renting rail use per-diem is not on the horizon. When the railcar operator is separated from the roadbed operator, all kinds of things will develop, including the use of rail very much as charter buses are used on road. That would open up large markets to entrepreneurs, just as air deregulation did, and just as bus deregulation did.

# re: Time to think ahead

Left by Michael Komenda at 6/12/2009 8:15 AM
Would really like to see GM get back into making Mass Transit Vehicles.They produced some great and reliable transit buses. In a search for alternative energy powered vehicles it seems that steam power is never mentioned. With the technology improvements of CNG boiler and other methods to create steam, this area seems to be untapped. (Pun intended). Transit vehicles create a lot of heat from their brake systems which could also be scavaged to suppliment the process. Steam has been a reliable and cheap method of power for centuries. Time to think outside the box and become less dependant on conventional fuels.

# re: Time to think ahead

Left by David at 6/12/2009 8:33 AM
Oh ye with short memories. GM once made buses, and very good buses at that. The problem was that they could not compete in a low bid transit environment that focused on low initial cost while ignoring long term operating cost. GM also at one time owned EMD which made locomotives (and still does under new ownership). The problem with GM in general and American industry as a whole is lack of long term vision. Government policies and Wall Street pressure have not helped, but it is and has been a leadership issue.

# re: Time to think ahead

Left by Laurence Krieg at 6/13/2009 7:19 AM
"The problem with GM in general and American industry as a whole is lack of long term vision." This is so very, very true!
"For those of us not in high density areas, the first mile, last mile issue means transit will never be more than a minor player in transporting working Americans." Low density has been caused by extensive subsidy of the highway system, leading to sprawl. As energy costs rise, this trend will be countered by market forces, denser development will prevail, and transit will become more important - though never to the exclusion of private vehicles.

# re: Time to think ahead

Left by Geary L. Robinson at 6/15/2009 6:52 AM
The premise of GM, Chrysler or Ford building transit buses could be likened to bus manufacturers being asked to build fuel efficient cars, neither is going to happen. The UAW secured the lion’s share of financial relief over all other creditors and investors in the bankruptcies of Chrysler and GM. UAW will never agree to building buses and I am not sure I would trust them to do so.

Politics aside, there is a solution:

1. A stronger balance between revenues spent on the aging U.S. Highway systems and public transportation,

2. Reduction of urban sprawl through more Transit Oriented Developments,

3. A national policy for Transportation Demand Management to review all modes of transport, not just the car or bus.

4. Development of fuel efficient vehicle’s having a minimum mpg of 40 in town and 50 mpg on the highway coupled with a reduction of the posted speed limit nationally at 65 mph. ( My 2006 VW Jetta TDI would meet the a new standard with those mpg requirements)

Your comment:



 (will not be displayed)


 
 
 
Please add 4 and 2 and type the answer here:
 

Live Comment Preview:

 
«March»
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
28123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031123
45678910